Publications

in press

  • Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (in press). Information easiness affects non-experts' evaluation of scientific claims about which they hold prior beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, Section Cognitive Psychology.

2020

  • Braasch, J. L. G. & Scharrer, L. (2020). The role of cognitive conflict in understanding and learning from multiple perspectives. In Van Meter, P. N., List, A., Lombardi, D., & Kendeou, P. (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives. New York: Routledge.
  • Rouet, J.-F., Saux, G., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2020). Inside document models: The role of source attributes in integrating multiple text contents. Discourse Processes. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2020.1750246

    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

  • Stadtler, M. (2020). Non scholae, sed vitae discimus: Zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen und Wissen im Schülerlabor. In: K. Sommer, J. Wirth & M. Vanderbeke (Hrsg.), Handbuch Forschen im Schülerlabor. Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Forschungsmethoden und aktuelle Anwendungsgebiete. Münster: Waxmann.
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2019

2018

2017

2016

  • Bromme, R., Kienhues, D. & Stadtler, M. (2016). Die kognitive Arbeitsteilung als Herausforderung der Forschung zu epistemischen Überzeugungen. In A.-K. Mayer & T. Rosman (Hrsg.), Denken über Wissen und Wissenschaft. Epistemologische Überzeugungen als Gegenstand psychologischer Forschung (S. 25-38). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Scharrer, L. & Salmerón, L. (Guest Eds.) (2016). Sourcing in the reading process: introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing, 29, 1539–1548. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9676-2 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Bromme, R. (2016). Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies. Reading and Writing, 29, 705-729. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2015

  • Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., Hömberg, J., & Torspecken, R. (2015). Is it believable when it’s scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople’s resolution of conflicts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 36-57.  doi: 10.1002/tea.21172 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Paul, J., Globoschütz, S., & Bromme, R. (2015). Watch out! - An instruction raising students’ epistemic vigilance augments their sourcing activities. In: D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2278-2283). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2014

  • Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). You'd better ask an expert: Mitigating the comprehensibility effect on laypeople's decisions about science-based knowledge claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 465-471. doi: 10.1002/acp.3018 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences (pp. 379-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Bromme, R. & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). „Science meets Reading“: Worin bestehen die Kompetenzen zum Lesen multipler Dokumente zu Wissenschaftsthemen und wie fördert man sie? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 55-68. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Skodzik, T., & Bromme, R. (2014). Comprehending multiple documents on scientific controversies: Effects of reading goals and signaling rhetorical relationships. Discourse Processes, 51, 93-116. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.855535 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2013

  • Scharrer, L., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2013). Easy to understand but difficult to decide: Information comprehensibility and controversiality affect laypeople's science-based decisions. Discourse Processes, 50, 361-387. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.813835 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (Guest Eds.) (2013). Special Issue on Multiple Document Comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 121-269. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2013). Multiple Document Comprehension: An approach to public understanding of science. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 122-129. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2013.771106 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M.,Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2013). How do readers explain the occurrence of conflicts in science texts? Effects of presentation format and source expertise? In M. Knauff, N. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3448-3453). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers’ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 130-150. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769996 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2012

  • Scharrer, L., Britt, M.A., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2012). Beyond one’s own understanding: How text comprehensibility affects laypeople’s decision about scientific claims. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.965-970). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Scharrer, L., Bromme, R., Britt, M. A., & Stadtler, M. (2012). The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople’s reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information. Learning and Instruction, 22, 231-243. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.004 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2012). Does relevance matter in comprehending scientific conflicts from multiple documents? Evidence from online and offline-data. In E. de Vries, & K. Scheiter (Eds.), Staging Knowledge and Experience: How to  Take Advantage of Representational  Technologies in Education and Training? Proceedings of the EARLI SIG 2 Meeting (pp. 202-204), Grenoble, France: EARLI SIG 2. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2011

  • Brand-Gruwel, S. & Stadtler, M. (2011). Solving information-based problems: Evaluating sources and information. Learning and Instruction, 21, 175-179. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.008 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Britt, A. M., & Stadtler, M. (2011). Effects of information comprehensibility and argument type on lay recipients’readiness to defer to experts when deciding about scientific knowledge claims. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T.F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2788 -2793). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the Web: When expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21, 193-204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M. & Brand-Gruwel, S. (Eds.) (2011). Special Section: Solving information based problems: searching, selecting and evaluating information. Learning and Instruction, 21, 175-242. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., & Bromme, R. (2011). How reading goals and rhetorical signals influence recipients’ recognition of intertextual conflicts. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T.F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1346 -1351). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2009

2008

2007

  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191-210. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2006

  • Stadtler, M. (2006). Auf der Suche nach medizinischen Fachinformationen. Metakognitionen bei der Internetrecherche von Laien. Münster: Waxmann. (A review by Joerg Wittwer, IPN Kiel, has been published in Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie) doi: 10.1026/1617-6383.19.3.130 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stahl, E., Bromme, R, Stadtler, M., & Jaron R. (2006). Learning by hypertext writing: effects of considering a single audience versus multiple audiences on knowledge acquisition. In D. Galbraith, L. van Waes, & M. Torrance (Eds.), Recent developments in writing process research. Volume 2: Methods and applications. Series: Studies in writing (pp. 307-321). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1163/9781849508223_021 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2005

  • Bromme, R. & Stadtler, M. (2005). So much information. But which is important? Which is true? Supporting laypersons' informal learning from science based evidence on the internet. In T. Okamoto, D. Albert, T. Honda, & F. Hesse (Eds.), The 2 nd Joint Workshop on Cognition and Learning through Media-Communication for Advanced e-Learning (pp.28-33). Sophia University: Tokyo, Japan. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use
  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme (2005). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2068-2073). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3 ​
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

2004

  • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2004). Laypersons searching the WWW for medical information: The role of metacognition. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Reiger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1638). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 
    Please send me a copy of this paper for my personal use

Ansprechpartner / Sekretariat

Stefanie Nüsken

Tel: 0234 / 32- 27324

Mail: kompetenzforschung@rub.de
Web: http://ife.rub.de/kom-kom

Raum: GA 2 / 32

Öffnungszeiten:
Mo:
9:00-14:00
Mi:
9:00-14:00
Do:
9:00-14:00